Jump to content

User talk:Piotrus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This user wrote 632 DYKs: 632
This user wrote 82 Good-class articles.: 82
This user wrote 6 A-class articles.: 6
=This user wrote 22 Featured-class articles.: 22
There is no Cabal

You have the right to stay informed. Exercise it by reading the Wikipedia Signpost today.
This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived. Sections without timestamps (not signed with ~~~~) are archived manually when I get around to it.


Please start all new discussions at the bottom of this page and include a heading. When in doubt, click the "New Section" button above.

If I left you a message on your talk page, please answer it there by indenting one line and starting your response with a ping: {{Ping|Piotrus}} If you leave me a message here on my talk page, I will answer your message here by pinging you.

Always sign your message (by clicking the sign button or by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~). Thanks in advance.

Reasons for my raising wikistress:

Some general observations on Wikipedia governance being broken and good editors trampled by the system
Wikipedia is a kawaii mistress :)
I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms.

Lurking stats

[edit]
Page views for this talk page over the last 90 days

Detailed traffic statistics

DYK for German atrocities committed against prisoners of war during World War II

[edit]

On 9 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article German atrocities committed against prisoners of war during World War II, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that while Germans murdered millions of prisoners of war during WWII, the survival ratio of Jewish POWs was generally tied to the army or nation they served with, and not to their ethnicity? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/German atrocities committed against prisoners of war during World War II. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, German atrocities committed against prisoners of war during World War II), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 12:03, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hook update
Your hook reached 9,924 views (827.0 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of January 2025 – nice work!
GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 10 January 2025 (UTC) [reply]
story · music · places

Thank you for the article! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:19, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Today, pictured on the Main page, Tosca, in memory of her first appearance on stage OTD in 1900, and of principal author Brian Boulton. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:13, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Anglo-American

[edit]

Hi. Not adverse to a dab, however the first item does not point to a particular subject, rather it is more of a definition than a link to an article on that subject. Therefore there is currently only one valid target. Onel5969 TT me 11:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969 I am not sure if this is against policy? There is also Anglo American plc. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:35, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. I'm pretty sure it is. One of the 3 aspects of a dab page is "Ensuring that a reader who searches for a topic using a particular term can get to the information on that topic quickly and easily, whichever of the possible topics it might be." The first item on the dab page was little more than a definition, and definitely didn't link to get the reader to a particular topic. In addition, each bullet on a dab should only have a single blue link. Also, I'm not quite sure what you intended to refer to in that first definition. Did you mean inhabitants of those 5 countries? Those 5 countries as a group? Or that each of those countries might also be referred to by that term? Finally, re: the plc, that can be handled by a hatnote, since the demographic is clearly the primary target. Onel5969 TT me 18:59, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Onel5969 The point is that Anglo-American refers, primarily, to "both Britain and the US."; the redirect to Anglo-Americans is misleading. This is also true for many links pointing to it. Anyway, I fortunately found a proper single article to use in the disambig (Anglosphere). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:19, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Should this be merged with Anglo American disambig? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:22, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good. I made a slight tweak, since each entry should only have 1 blue link. Let me know what you think. And regarding the merge, yes, probably, that would simplify searches. Onel5969 TT me 10:53, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Onel5969 Could you do the merge? I also think that the Anglo-American Publishing does not belong there per WP:PARTIAL (but the plc is ok, since it is sometimes referred to without the plc). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 00:44, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done. I added the publishing house, for while I understand your point about PARTIAL, I also think that someone searching for the publishing house might only put in the first two words. Onel5969 TT me 01:57, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Onel5969 Fair, but consider we have a bunch of other stuff like Anglo-American School of Moscow, Anglo-American loan and quite a few others I see from the search... Oh, we should probably redirect Anglo-american to the disambig too? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:00, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I see your point now. In light of that, I'll remove the publishing house, and yes, Anglo-american should also point to the dab. I'll take care of it. Onel5969 TT me 10:48, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Allied prisoners of war in Japan

[edit]

On 12 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Allied prisoners of war in Japan, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the harsh treatment of Allied prisoners of war in Japan is well known in the West but mostly ignored or glossed over in Japan itself? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Allied prisoners of war in Japan. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Allied prisoners of war in Japan), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:04, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 225, January 2025

[edit]
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:17, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Polish language help

[edit]

Hi Piotrus,

I wrote an article on the ToNiePokój escape room fire, and am doing some research for information to expand it. My Polish is not very good yet, and the passage "Prokurator zwróciła także uwagę na opinię biegłych, według których budynek był w złym stanie technicznym. - Nie było tam stałego źródła ogrzewania, a o wynajmie zadecydowała niska cena czynszu - dodała. W mowie końcowej wypunktowano także zlekceważenie obowiązku wprowadzenia stałego ogrzewania do lokalu usługowego i instrukcji obsługi tych urządzeń. - Piecyki gazowe, mające ogrzewać lokal, umieszczono w pomieszczeniach pozbawionych wentylacji i zawierających materiały łatwopalne - podkreśliła prokurator Sielska." (from [1]) is confusing me and Google translate is coming up with gibberish. If it is not too much trouble, would you mind giving me the gist of the passage? Thank you for any help you can provide. All the best, Grumpylawnchair (talk) 16:53, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Grumpylawnchair Sure. Here's my corrected Google Translate: The prosecutor also drew attention to the experts opinion, according to which the building was in poor technical condition. - There was no permanent source of heating there, and the low rent was the deciding factor in renting it - she added. The final speech also highlighted the neglect of the obligation to introduce permanent heating to the service premises and the [the neglect of the obligation to follow the] instructions for using these devices. - Gas heaters, which were supposed to heat the premises, were placed in rooms without ventilation and containing flammable materials - emphasized prosecutor Sielsak
Overall, GT did a good job; it changed experts to expert. I an not sure what else could be confusing, but I clarified one part that might be unclear in the original? Is there anything else you'd like to ask about this passage? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:55, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No, thank you. I realised that I had used Firefox's local translate instead of Google Translate, and that's what caused the gibberish. I still have issues in understanding more formal Polish sometimes, since I learn as a hobby, and I guess that the conjugation confused me. All the best, Grumpylawnchair (talk) 04:04, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Małe zielone ludziki

[edit]

The article Małe zielone ludziki you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Małe zielone ludziki for comments about the article, and Talk:Małe zielone ludziki/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TompaDompa -- TompaDompa (talk) 18:41, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 15 January 2025

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:55, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ten no Hate Made – Poland Hishi

[edit]

hello! i read through your GA review of ten no hate made. i don't mind assisting with some of the japanese, but i'm going in relatively blind, having only read versailles, claudine, and oniisama e... i'm a little pre-occupied right now, but if you can point me in the direction for what you need or give me some sources to work from, i'd be happy to help any way i can! Plifal (talk) 13:19, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Plifal Much appreciated. I don't know if there are any academic works mentioning this in Japanese, but I'd expect there should be at least some reviews or such? I'd be very curious if there was any commentary by Japanese reviewers on the choice of subject matter (Polish history), which is very rare in Japan, but I'll settle for just learning what the reviewers said (assuming any can be found). Versailles is pretty famous, so I'd think someone would notice that spin off... Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:48, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Piotrus&oldid=1269803095"